W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Aug (updated)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:19:10 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1093295950.2934.4.camel@dirk>

1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda

  RDF Data Access Working Group
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  Tuesday 2004-08-24 14:30 UTC
  Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
  http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
  supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
       log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/08/24-dawg-irc

Scribe: EricP

roll call; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
regrets: Bryan Thompson

PROPOSED: to accept
 Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-08-17 for review
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0285.html
ammended per
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0287.html
as a true record.

I don't think these merit discussion:
DONE DanC: evaluate Tom's proposed reply.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0284.html

ACTION: TomA: draft reply to Bjoerern Hoehrmann and send the
drafts to the WG mailing list. CONTINUES.


next meeting 2004-08-31. Scribe?

agenda ammendments?


2. Review "Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition"?

c.f.  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0219.html

ACTION EricP: read http://www.w3.org/TR/semantic-interpretation/ and let DAWG
know what, if any, dependencies there are/should be.

ACTION SteveH: read http://www.w3.org/TR/semantic-interpretation/ and let DAWG
know what, if any, dependencies there are/should be.


3. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management 

ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from
uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE.
CONTINUES

ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with
respect to the provenance. CONTINUES.

ACTION DaveB: propose an way to address the SOURCE issue. CONTINUES.



4. Reporting b-nodes

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#i_bnodes

ACTION SimonR: write about the "returning bnodes from a query" issue.


5. XQuery integration requirements/objective

ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting
XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September
meeting in Bristol. CONTINUES.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa


6. WG meeting schedule

ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and
inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September.

I found the date and put it on the WG homepage:
 28 February - 4 March 2005
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#sched

Shall we have a ftf in Jan? Who would like to host?

note also:
 reconsidering teleconference time Dan Connolly (Monday, 16 August)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0275.html


ftf3 agenda due this Thu, per W3C process. reading list?



7. Use Cases & Requirements done?

withdraw these? are folks still on holiday?

ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services
use 
case. CONTINUES.

ACTION: RobS write email to Farrukh about traversing a taxonomy. CONTINUES

ACTION SimonR: continue discussing and promoting union query for UC4.5.
CONTINUES.

ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the UC&R
doc. CONTINUES.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 21:18:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT