Minutes look good overall. Minor question: was I given some action to communicate with someone about the ebXML use case? > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly > Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 1:42 PM > To: RDF Data Access Working Group > Subject: Carlsbad RDF Data Access ftf minutes for review > > > Since there was interest in reviewing actions at a telcon > this Tuesday (20 July), I edited the notes and produced: > > July 2004 RDF Data Access Working Group Meeting in Carlsbad, > California > by Dan Connolly, chair > with thanks to the scribes: Kendall Clark, Andy Seaborne, > Prud'hommeaux, > Jos De Roo, Simon Raboczi > $Revision: 1.29 $ of $Date: 2004/07/18 07:31:31 $ by > $Author: connolly > $ > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2 > > Please review it and let me/us know if it's OK. (If two or > three people have already sent "OK" mail and you have no > corrections, it's OK if you don't bother.) > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > > >Received on Sunday, 18 July 2004 21:26:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:58 GMT