W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: design eval matrix in RDF and N3

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 05:46:02 -0700
To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOEECOENAA.howardk@fatdog.com>

I get a 403: Forbidden on both those urls.
Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Kendall Clark
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:21 AM
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: design eval matrix in RDF and N3
> 
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I put together a bit of RDF (a few hundred assertions, as I recall)
> representing our evaluations of initial query language and protocol
> designs. I'll be keeping it updated as or if new evaluations come in.
> 
> I'm having some troubles with W3's CVS, but those should be tamed
> eventually --
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/design-eval.rdf
> 	http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/design-eval.n3
> 
> I made up a namespace for the WG and for the UCR doc, as well as some
> predicates in each namespace. Yes, there are several other ways I
> could have done this RDF, including using a bag for the requirements
> and design objectives, but -shrug-. I also coined a TAG URI to
> identify the designs we evaluated (since I wasn't sure they all had
> stable "home pages", and I don't like the "home page stands for foo"
> idiom much).
> 
> Ping me or ask on-list if something is wrong or unclear. I validated
> the resulting RDF but that's about all I'll warrant for these files.
> 
> Best,
> Kendall Clark
> -- 
> Sometimes it's appropriate, even patriotic, to be ashamed
> of your country. -- James Howard Kunstler
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2004 08:44:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT