W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

Agenda: RDF Data Access 6 June

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 08:02:57 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1089032576.21030.2610.camel@dirk>

1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda

  RDF Data Access Working Group
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  Tuesday 2004-07-06 14:30 UTC
  Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
  http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
  supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
       log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/06-dawg-irc

Scribe: Simon Raboczi
Regrets: Steve Harris, Janne Saarela

Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-06-29 for review (v2)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0016.html

next meeting: telcon 12 July? if so, scribe volunteer?
  ftf 14-15 July in Carlsbad, CA
  scribe volunteer for 1st session?

DONE: Kendall, Change link text to be something other than raw URLs.
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/DesignEvaluations

further input to todays agenda?


2. ftf update

 Agenda is running late
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2

ACTION: EricP, check with Rob/Network Inference if 2 hours 
teleconference facility can be organized on both days at 11am-1pm PST.


3. Requirement: 3.6 Optional Match

ACTION: SimonR, advocate "3.6 Optional Match" in an eMail message


4. Requirement 3.12 Streaming Results

This was approved last week, but we haven't updated the draft, as
of

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases
  $Revision: 1.122 $ of $Date: 2004/06/21 15:50:39 $

I suppose this update was too small to bother just yet,
but I don't want to lose it.


4. Directory Service Use Cases

ACTION: Farrukh, write up ebXML registry UC
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0009.html

ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use
case (no rush).


5. Initial Design Poll

  Poll: RDF Data Access WG: initial design
  http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/

DONE: DanC, split vote into query and protcool sections.
DONE: DanC, remove "Asemantics variant of RDQL", changing RDQL to be one
proposal.

Hmm... add TAP's GetData?

Only 8 (out of 18) answers received. I moved the close
date from 5 July to 6 July. PLEASE ANSWER IT SOON!


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 5 July 2004 09:02:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT