W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnaire

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:49:51 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1088722191.21030.2371.camel@dirk>

I just got back from my trip, and I thought maybe
I could meet the 1 July deadline for the ftf agenda,
but I have only 4 answers to this questionnaire.

Silly me gave a deadline of 5 July when I really
needed the data sooner.

Please fill it out as soon as you can, OK?
You can revise your answers later.

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:07, Dan Connolly wrote:
> Among the tentative goals of our upcoming ftf
> meeting is:
> 
> "
>       * Choose an Initial Design"
>  -- http://jp.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2
> 
> but I see various conflicts preventing many WG members
> from attending, so I'd like to collect some data asynchronously
> to see where we are, i.e. whether a decision made by those
> that attend in person is likely to be supported by the rest
> of the WG.
> 
> So I put together a web-based poll:
> 
>   RDF Data Access WG: initial design
>   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/
> 
> Everybody please fill it out in the next week or so,
> so that I can put the results in the agenda of the 6 July
> telcon.
> 
> Until the telcon tomorrow, consider it in "beta test" mode;
> I won't throw away any data that you put in there, but I 
> reserve the right to edit the question underneath your answers
> thru tomorrow or the next day.
> 
> The list of choices is based on KC's recent summary, but
> I salted to taste. I'm open to add candidates or change
> descriptions over the next day or so. (There's little
> reason to remove a candidate; if it doesn't deserve
> to be there, the results should show that.)
> 
> The form of the question is rank ordering. Since this
> form of question counts answers to produce averages
> and such, I've limited it to one answer per organization
> (each invited expert gets one answer).
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2004 18:48:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT