On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:57:28AM +0200, Alberto Reggiori wrote: > RDQL. And what it is not contemplated in the current BRQL syntax can be > most probably be expressed using ad-hoc AND constraints or extension > functions. I didn't mean to cause anyone concern or consternation over the "dialect" descriptor. I was trying to quickly summarize a lot of discussion and I thought "dialect" was more accurate than "variant". I think the main point is that the message I included in the summary contains interesting, relevant information. I'll change the "dialect" bit if I update the document. KendallReceived on Monday, 28 June 2004 19:24:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:57 GMT