W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 June

From: Thompson, Bryan B. <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:09:55 -0400
Message-Id: <D24D16A6707B0A4B9EF084299CE99B391092CB8D@mcl-its-exs02.mail.saic.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org

At least partial regrets.  I have a staff meeting that got rescheduled over


-----Original Message-----
From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:20 PM
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 June

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:38, Dan Connolly wrote:
> [Since I owe an agenda by 14:30Z, here's what I've got so far.]

1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda

  RDF Data Access Working Group
  Tuesday 2004-06-29 14:30 UTC*
  Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
  supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
       log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc

Scribe: AndyS.

Minutes of the RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-22 for review

next meeting: telcon 2004-07-06
  scribe volunteer?

DONE: ACTION to Kendall: remove 3.6 variant

further input to todays agenda?

2. ftf update

Registration form shows only 8 of the 18 WG members attending. Ouch.

Agenda in progress
  $Revision: 1.4 $ 

ACTION to EricP: check with Rob/Network Inference if 2 hours 
teleconference facility can be organized on both days at 11am-1pm PST. (I've
seen some progress, but I won't consider this really finished until the ftf2
page answers the questions I've seen.)

3. Streaming requirement

ACTION to Kendall: include the new wording about streaming
in the UC&R document. Group can then vote on its acceptance/rejection next


"3.12 Streaming Results
It must be possible, when returning multiple unordered results, for the
client to request that results be streamed. When the client requests
streaming results, all the data in one result must be available to the
client before all the data for the next result."
 -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases#r3.12

PROPOSED: to adopt that requirement.

4. Testing

ACTION SteveH: add ericP's disjunction tests to test cases doc - CONTINUED

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 18:10:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:44 UTC