RE: XSRQL proposal

> To make the bootstrapping process a bit shorter, could you contrast
> this approach with XQuery with Functional Accessors [4] and
> TreeHugger [5]? I'm looking for short, broad statements like
> where XQueryFA gets to the graph via functions, XSRQL uses syntactic
> XPath extensions, or XSRQL favors the letter 'e' less than TreeHugger

Will do, sometime later today.
This response brought to you by the letter 'X',
Howard
\
> 
> > [1] http://www.fatdog.com/xsrql.html#Introduction
> > 
> > [2]  http://www.fatdog.com/xsrql.html#Path%20language
> > 
> > [3] http://www.fatdog.com/xsrql.html#Examples
> 
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/11/13-RDF-Query-Rules/#XQueryFA
> 
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/11/13-RDF-Query-Rules/#TreeHugger
> -- 
> -eric
> 
> office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
>                         Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
>                         5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
>                         JAPAN
>         +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
> cell:   +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia)
> 
> (eric@w3.org)
> Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
> email address distribution.
>