- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: "'kendall@monkeyfist.com'" <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > justify this WG getting involved. Some of the issues are more bound to > registering MIME types and the time/work that takes. Which is not that much at all. > If we can find a way to have an extensible "Accept:"-like scheme that used Non registered payloads can use the 'x-' conventions. > URIs then that presumably would meet your need for the design goal? That, or using a RDF-Accept: would be frowned upon by just about every protocol chair. If you want to get away from everything that is broken or historically messy in HTTP - then do not use it :-) Switch to something like BEEP :-) Dw
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 05:26:53 UTC