W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Draft Requirement: Streamable results

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:51:26 +0100
Message-ID: <E864E95CB35C1C46B72FEA0626A2E808036155A2@0-mail-br1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Dave,

Good idea to make the wording allow for any result sequence form.

The re-wording is good as well.

	Andy

-------- Original Message --------
> From: Dave Beckett <>
> Date: 9 June 2004 15:02
> 
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:51:55 +0100 , "Seaborne, Andy"
> <andy.seaborne@hp.com> wrote: 
> 
> 
> > 3.? Streamable Results Format for Variable Binding Results
> > 
> > When returning Variable Binding Results (aref: #r3.2), there must be
> > a form of the protocol that allows streaming of results.  In this
> > form, the results must be returned to the client so that all the data
> > for one binding of the variables is available before data for the
> > next binding of variables is started.
> 
> Could this not be generalised to just talk about results (or result
> sequences, or result sets)?  This would cover returning multiple
> graphs IF that was decided as a result format.
> 
> Let me try a rewrite:
> 
> 3.? Streamable Results
> 
> When returning multiple results there must be a form of the protocol
> that allows streaming of results.  In this form, the results must be
> returned to the client so that all the data in one result are
> available before all the data for the next result.
> 
> Optional addition:
> This does not require an ordering of results but that each result
> is available one at a time.
> 
> <snip/>
> 
> Dave
Received on Friday, 11 June 2004 05:08:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT