W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review

From: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:20:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CFE388CECDDB1E43AB1F60136BEB497303FE63@rome.ad.networkinference.com>
To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

> In the above, I assume tuples as the unit of measure. Rob raised
> the issue that (correct me here) the client could be doing some
> inferencing which would give more [or fewer, i note] results than
> specified in the limit. I think that's fine, that it does't reduce
> the utility of specifying a limit.

That wasn't me (despite use of the word 'inferencing').
I recall the comment on the telecon though, and I didn't really
understand it at the time.
Can whoever brought it up elaborate?
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 19:22:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT