- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:03:14 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:52:13 -0400, Jim Hendler wrote: > > Maybe I didn't understand what 4.6 was about, I assumed it was > something like this: > > if I have > a rdfs:subClassOf b > b rdfs:subClassOf c > > then I was assuming that the requirments in UC&R would imply that if > I query for > a rdfs:subClassOf ?x > then ?x would be bound to b > however, if we include 4.6, then we would be expected to return > ?x = b and ?x = c I understood could return ?x = b and ?x = c, rather than expected. - Steve
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 07:03:18 UTC