That's my expectation as well. Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Jim Hendler <> > Date: 9 June 2004 02:53 > > Maybe I didn't understand what 4.6 was about, I assumed it was > something like this: > > if I have > a rdfs:subClassOf b > b rdfs:subClassOf c > > then I was assuming that the requirments in UC&R would imply that if > I query for > a rdfs:subClassOf ?x > then ?x would be bound to b > however, if we include 4.6, then we would be expected to return > ?x = b and ?x = c > > if I'm misunderstanding, please let know. > -JHReceived on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 06:39:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT