W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: *DRAFT*: writeup of joseki in response to action taken at last DA WG telcon.

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 07:53:12 -0500
To: "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
Cc: "'Seaborne, Andy '" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "'''public-rdf-dawg@w3.org' ' '" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-id: <1085575992.3204.36.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 05:36, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
[...]
> 	j+ : joseki supports this requirement today under a suitable
>  	     protocol binding and/or query language.
> 
> 	j- : the requirement appears to be explicitly outside of the
> 	     scope of joseki, which is not to say that it could NOT be
> 	     met by a suitable revision of joseki.
> 
> 	j? : need more information to make the determination.
> 
> Requirements:
> 
> j+ : 3.1 RDF Graph Pattern Matching (inherited from query lang.)

Hmm... it would be more clear/useful to me if you evaluated
either Joseki alone or Joseki plus some specific query language(s).

By itself, it seems to me that joseki does _not_ meet this requirement.
[...]

> [1] http://www.joseki.org
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases
> [3] http://www.joseki.org/protocol.html
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2004 08:53:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT