W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge)

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 20:46:19 +0100
To: "'Rob Shearer'" <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>, <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000601c43c47$a23a97b0$0a01a8c0@atlas>



-------- Original Message --------
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <>
> Date: 17 May 2004 20:05
> 
> The proposed rewording of my proposed rewording seems to be
> nothing but a removal of the reference to SWRL. I included
> that language in the list quite intentionally--I felt it was
> important to include a language that can be used to describe
> RDF models but does NOT necessarily have any RDF encoding.
> 
> Why are we working so hard to make sure not to mention SWRL?

Minor, but SWRL is a proposal, not a W3C recommendation or output from a
standards body.  The final rules langauage for the (semantic) web will
probably have a different name to distinuish from the SWRL work.

	Andy

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kendall Clark [mailto:kendall@monkeyfist.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 11:10 AM
> > To: Rob Shearer
> > Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> > Subject: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic
> > knowledge) 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:52:52PM -0700, Rob Shearer wrote:
> > 
> > > 4.6 Additional semantic knowledge
> > > It should be possible for knowledge encoded in other semantic
> > > languages, such as RDFS, OWL, and SWRL to affect the results of
> > > queries about RDF graphs.
> > 
> > In the interests of making progress, I'm willing to accept Rob's
> > version, above, of my original proposal.  In the current UC&R doc, my
> > original is 4.6 and Rob's variant is 4.6a.
> > 
> > So, I'd be willing to accept a modest reworking of 4.6a:
> > 
> > Additional Semantic Information
> > 
> > It should be possible for knowledged encode din other semantic
> > languages -- for example: RDFS, OWL, etc. -- to affect the results of
> > queries about RDF graphs. 
> > 
> > In fact, unless someone objects, I'd like to make that the language in
> > the document and the version which we vote on at some point.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Kendall Clark
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 15:46:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT