W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 11 May

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:52:31 +0100
To: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20040511105231.GB11825@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:16:23 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Steve,
> 
> Would dropping that last part make it acceptable [1]: I don't think it met
> with much support:

Yes, that would be fine as far as I'm concerned.
 
> - - - - - - - - - - - 
> 3.4 Subgraph Results
> 
> It must be possible to select an entailed subgraph of a queried graph.  In
> this case, the results are themselves an RDF graph.
> - - - - - - - - - - - 
> 
> 
> I'd like to get help with the term "entailed" here - it is just my
> understanding of how to view virtual triples as a possible RDF graph
> satisfying the (not directly visible) abox/tbox.
> 
> Maybe s/an entailed of/a/

Modulo this, I'm not sure what entailed implies here.

- Steve 
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 06:52:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT