W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages

From: Damian Steer <damste@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:48:37 +0100
To: Stephane Fellah <fellah@pcigeomatics.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-rdf-rules@w3.org
Message-Id: <1083224916.3476.13.camel@torgo>
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 21:56, Stephane Fellah wrote:
> Hi,

/me trims massive crossposting

> This is an interesting query language. Does it exist an implementation in Java (based on Jena for example) ?

I think most (all?) of the paths should work in TreeHugger, which is
implemented in java - most of the heavy lifting is done by jena and
saxon (path expressions, XSLT, XQuery). It's the same idea as RxPath but
mine was more of a thought experiment, i.e. it may be broken, do not
rely on it for medical use etc ;-) Adam's stuff is more robust, I
suspect. But TreeHugger is BSD-style licenced, and I don't think it's
too hard to understand if you want to play around.

> Best regards
>  
> Stephane Fellah

Hope that helps,

Damian

http://rdfweb.org/people/damian/treehugger/

PS I'm not sure if I've added in the descendant-or-self stuff - I'll
check later.

Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:09:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT