On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Rob Shearer wrote: > > The WG discussed forming a list of candidate requirements - both to > > accept and to reject. The following were accepted: > > This makes is sound as though the following are accepted requirements. > My understanding was that the proposed+seconded system simply helped > build the list of candidates, and acceptance or rejection will come > after discussion and possibly full votes. > > s/were accepted/will be added to the list of candidates/ Sorry for that, your correction better expresses what I intended to record. It's just a list of possible requirements at the moment. DaveReceived on Thursday, 1 April 2004 16:24:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:56 GMT