- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:50:39 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On 26/11/2018 17:51, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote: > Hi, folks -- > > In the Errata -- > > https://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata#sparql11-federated-query > > -- for "SPARQL 1.1 Federated Query" -- > > https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-federated-query/#values > > -- I found reference to this -- > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2013Apr/0007.html > >> From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> >> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:54:59 +0200 >> Message-ID: <517D2A33.5040208@csarven.ca> >> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org >> CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> >> >> The last queryGroup example at [1] is not the right example (missing >> VALUES). >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-federated-query/#values > > > I wonder if the Errata could be updated to include the example > query that's missing from the TR? Sure - what do you think the query should be? > > Thanks, > > Ted > > > -- > A: Yes. http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html > | Q: Are you sure? > | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > > Ted Thibodeau, Jr. // voice +1-781-273-0900 x32 > Senior Support & Evangelism // mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com > // http://twitter.com/TallTed > OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ > 20 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 322, Burlington MA 01803 > Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/ > Community -- https://community.openlinksw.com/ > LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/ > Twitter -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink > Google+ -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/ > Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware > Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2018 14:51:11 UTC