- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:26:26 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
good morning;
> On 2015-05-20, at 16:06, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
> Subject: Re: how does one reconcile delete-using-02.ru to the effect of from/from-named with respect to a constant graph term
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 21:23:41 +0100
> From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
>
> On 18/05/15 16:27, james anderson wrote:
>> good afternoon;
>>
>> for the test dawg-delete-using-02a, the query[1] and the ancillary
>> dataset documents imply that the constant value in a ‘using' clause
>> should override a constant term in a ‘graph' clause.
>
> Hi james,
>
> It would be helpful if you could provide pointers or quotes that lead
> you to the conclusions you state.
i find this entry in the delete test set manifest:
:dawg-delete-using-02a a mf:UpdateEvaluationTest ;
mf:name "Simple DELETE 2 (USING)" ;
rdfs:comment "This is a simple test to make sure the GRAPH clause does not override the USING clause" ;
dawgt:approval dawgt:Approved;
dawgt:approvedBy <http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-09-25#resolution_3> ;
mf:action [ ut:request <delete-using-02.ru> ;
ut:data <delete-pre-01.ttl> ;
ut:graphData [ ut:graph <delete-pre-02.ttl> ;
rdfs:label "http://example.org/g2" ] ;
ut:graphData [ ut:graph <delete-pre-03.ttl> ;
rdfs:label "http://example.org/g3" ]
] ;
mf:result [ ut:data <delete-post-01f.ttl> ;
ut:graphData [ ut:graph <delete-post-02f.ttl> ;
rdfs:label "http://example.org/g2" ] ;
ut:graphData [ ut:graph <delete-post-03f.ttl> ;
rdfs:label "http://example.org/g3" ]
] .
best regards, from berlin,
---
[1] : http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete/manifest.ttl
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 22:26:57 UTC