- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:27:55 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Cc: tech@dydra.com
good afternoon; for the test dawg-delete-using-02a, the query[1] and the ancillary dataset documents imply that the constant value in a ‘using' clause should override a constant term in a ‘graph' clause. the comment in the manifest[2] reiterates this conclusion and a note during the approval process indicates the effect of the ‘using’ clause was a matter of specific deliberation. on the other hand, this behavior contradicts the sparql evaluation specification[3] among other ways, in the interaction between default and named graphs, and the update recommendation itself provides only the description, that the using is to have the effect of a from/from-named is there some other version or some further explanation for this test? best regards, from berlin, — [1] : http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete/delete-using-02.ru [2] : http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete/manifest.ttl [3] : http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-query-20130321/#defn_evalGraph
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 15:28:26 UTC