- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 18:00:31 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
(email so that, in the future, if someone has to track down reports there's a trail) Ivan has recorded this: http://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata#errata-sd-1 Andy On 03/04/13 09:17, Polleres, Axel wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's a minor editorial erratum for SPARQL1.1 Service Description: > I just discovered a wrong/missing link in http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-service-description-20130321/#terminology > > This one: > --------------------- > <dd>Any implementation conforming to the <a href="">SPARQL 1.1 Protocol for RDF</a> (this document's use of "SPARQL Service" is the same as "<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol/#terminology">SPARQL Protocol service</a>" as defined in the SPARQL 1.1 Protocol) [<a href="#SPROT">SPROT</a>].</dd> > --------------------- > should rather be: > --------------------- > <dd>Any implementation conforming to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol/">SPARQL 1.1 Protocol for RDF</a> (this document's use of "SPARQL Service" is the same as "<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol/#terminology">SPARQL Protocol service</a>" as defined in the SPARQL 1.1 Protocol) [<a href="#SPROT">SPROT</a>].</dd> > --------------------- > > > Best, > Axel >
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 17:01:01 UTC