Re: No use of deprecated SCOVO in Service Description example

On 12/14/2012 03:59 AM, Jerven Bolleman wrote:
> Dear Workgroup,
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/#example defines a 
> prefix/namespace for the scovo ontology. The Scovo vocabulary is 
> deprecated and is not used in the examples.
>
> Removing the prefix namespace declaration does not change the 
> technical impact of the normative example. Just reduces a minor source 
> of confusion.
>
> Sincere regards and thanks for moving the standard forward,
> Jerven Bolleman
>
>

Thanks for pointing this out.   It's now been fixed in the editor's 
draft [1] and will be fixed in the next published version.

       -- Sandro

[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/xmlspec.xml

Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 11:39:59 UTC