W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Use of RIF-in-RDF in normative test (was Re: RIF entailment regime in SPARQL 1.1 standard)

From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:35:19 -0500
Cc: Benjamin Grosof <BenjaminG@vulcan.com>, "Michael Kifer (kifer@cs.sunysb.edu)" <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>, Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>, Paul Fodor <pfodor@cs.stonybrook.edu>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <BEB7D341-28E2-4EF5-AE2C-6A7F15AF403C@bbn.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>

> At ISWC I talked to you about the possibility of putting together a few more tests.   Any chance you've had the chance to do that?

I don't think I have time to develop more RIF entailment tests, but would be happy to run them if someone else does.

Thanks!

	Mike

application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s

Received on Friday, 23 November 2012 15:35:51 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sandro Hawke: "Re: Use of RIF-in-RDF in normative test (was Re: RIF entailment regime in SPARQL 1.1 standard)"
Previous message: Andy Seaborne: "Re: ORDER BY and literals"
In reply to: Sandro Hawke: "Use of RIF-in-RDF in normative test (was Re: RIF entailment regime in SPARQL 1.1 standard)"
Next in thread: Sandro Hawke: "Re: Use of RIF-in-RDF in normative test (was Re: RIF entailment regime in SPARQL 1.1 standard)"
Reply: Sandro Hawke: "Re: Use of RIF-in-RDF in normative test (was Re: RIF entailment regime in SPARQL 1.1 standard)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 November 2012 15:35:51 GMT