W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Editorial suggestion for CREATE operation

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:26:07 -0400
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Cc: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Message-ID: <1336764367.2232.61458.camel@dbooth-laptop>
Regarding DB-22, I am satisfied with this resolution.

Thank you,
David

---------------------
From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 08:09:28 +0200
To: "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID:
<9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE80138CF539998@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
Hi David,

Following your suggestion, we have in the latest Editor's draft at

   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#create

we have changed

"If the graph already exists, then a failure SHOULD be returned, except
when the SILENT keyword is used."

to

"If the graph already exists, then a failure SHOULD be returned, except
when the SILENT keyword is used; in either case, the contents of already
existing graphs remain unchanged."


We'd appreciate if you could briefly acknowledge that your comment has
been addressed.

Axel, on behalf of the SPARQL WG



> At http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#create
> I suggest adding the sentence: "If the graph already exists then its
> content is unchanged."
>
>
> --
> David Booth, Ph.D.
> http://dbooth.org/
>
> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
> reflect those of his employer.


-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 19:26:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 11 May 2012 19:26:38 GMT