W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Dave Beckett comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Language W3C WD 2010-10-14

From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:51:56 -0800
Message-ID: <4F57922C.5040905@dajobe.org>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
My apologies for my previous email.  I appreciate the work you have done and
was too harsh.

You can consider my December 2010 comment withdrawn since I do need any
answers today to my questions about the Oct 2010 working drafts

Dave

On 3/6/12 7:31 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Dear Dave, 
> 
> we were just going through old comments and apologize sincerely for not having answered earlier directly:
> there was discussion within the group around the issues mentioned in your comment and we 
> think that all has been addressed and/or obsoleted in recent drafts. 
> 
> Would you mind confirming that or let us know if any concerns remain?
> 
> sorry again for the very late response,
> best regards,
> Axel, on behalf of the SPARQL WG
> 
> On 2 May 2011, at 02:52, Dave Beckett wrote:
> 
>> Hey SPARQL WG - I made some comments on the October WDs in December:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Dec/0001.html
>>
>> I haven't heard any official response yet.  When will I get it?
>>
>> There don't seem to be any more recent WDs since October 2010 (7 months) and
>> I know there are changes since I've shipped code that implemented things
>> that are in WG editors drafts, which I know are unstable.
>>
>> So my second question is when will there be updated SPARQL 1.1 WDs?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 16:52:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 March 2012 16:52:22 GMT