- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:51:56 -0800
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
My apologies for my previous email. I appreciate the work you have done and was too harsh. You can consider my December 2010 comment withdrawn since I do need any answers today to my questions about the Oct 2010 working drafts Dave On 3/6/12 7:31 AM, Axel Polleres wrote: > Dear Dave, > > we were just going through old comments and apologize sincerely for not having answered earlier directly: > there was discussion within the group around the issues mentioned in your comment and we > think that all has been addressed and/or obsoleted in recent drafts. > > Would you mind confirming that or let us know if any concerns remain? > > sorry again for the very late response, > best regards, > Axel, on behalf of the SPARQL WG > > On 2 May 2011, at 02:52, Dave Beckett wrote: > >> Hey SPARQL WG - I made some comments on the October WDs in December: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Dec/0001.html >> >> I haven't heard any official response yet. When will I get it? >> >> There don't seem to be any more recent WDs since October 2010 (7 months) and >> I know there are changes since I've shipped code that implemented things >> that are in WG editors drafts, which I know are unstable. >> >> So my second question is when will there be updated SPARQL 1.1 WDs? >> >> Thanks >> >> Dave >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 16:52:22 UTC