W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Dave Beckett comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Language W3C WD 2010-10-14

From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:22:49 -0800
Message-ID: <4F56D489.3090209@dajobe.org>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On 3/6/12 7:31 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Dear Dave, 
> 
> we were just going through old comments and apologize sincerely for not having answered earlier directly:
> there was discussion within the group around the issues mentioned in your comment and we 
> think that all has been addressed and/or obsoleted in recent drafts. 
> 
> Would you mind confirming that or let us know if any concerns remain?

Due to the long delay (15 months) giving me no chance for supplementary
questions or possibility of changes, since the SPARQL WG process is so far
onwards, I absolutely do not consider these answered to my satisfaction.

This also puts me off any further dealings with W3C standards work.

Dave


> sorry again for the very late response,
> best regards,
> Axel, on behalf of the SPARQL WG
> 
> On 2 May 2011, at 02:52, Dave Beckett wrote:
> 
>> Hey SPARQL WG - I made some comments on the October WDs in December:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Dec/0001.html
>>
>> I haven't heard any official response yet.  When will I get it?
>>
>> There don't seem to be any more recent WDs since October 2010 (7 months) and
>> I know there are changes since I've shipped code that implemented things
>> that are in WG editors drafts, which I know are unstable.
>>
>> So my second question is when will there be updated SPARQL 1.1 WDs?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 03:23:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 March 2012 03:23:16 GMT