W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2012

Re: "Fresh" blank nodes vs. RDF Merge in Update

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:06:58 +0200
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <2328501.b98cuNfxJ8@owl>
On Tuesday 12. June 2012 20.04.43 Axel Polleres wrote:
> So, while in the special case of inserting data into a single graph this
> amounts  to the same as RDF/merge in RDF-MT is only defined in terms of
> graphs, but not in terms of graph stores or RDF datasets, we would
> prefer to keep explanatory the text "as is".

Ah, then I understand!

> We would kindly ask you to acknowledge that you are happy with this
> response,

Yes, I am happy with the response, thank you very much!

Kjetil
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:07:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:07:33 GMT