I am satisfied with this resolution. Thanks, David On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 18:11 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > David, > > Thank you for the feedback. > > The SPARQL-WG intends to keep this feature. > > We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been > answered by sending a reply to this mailing list. > > Andy > On behalf of SPARQL-WG > > > Regarding this at-risk feature: > > > > To align with the decision of RDF-WG to require at least > > one digit after the '.' of a decimal written in short > > form. A decimal would be 18.0, but not 18., which would > > tokenize as an integer and DOT. > > > > I am in favor of this change. > > -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 18:23:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 February 2012 18:23:40 GMT