W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Additional comments on the semantics of property paths

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:34:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4F9319D1.6090701@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org


On 20/04/12 13:35, W Martens wrote:
...
> However, from the your reply it is not clear to us whether the WG is
> actually going to follow "Option 6" as described by Andy Seaborne in
> this respect or not. (Maybe we missed it somewhere...)
>
> If the WG would follow it, we would consider the issue on simple paths
> to be resolved.

The Working Group resolution is:

RESOLVED: Adopt option 6 as per 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0285.html 
and 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0286.html, EricP 
abstaining

Link:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-03#resolution_3

	Andy
Received on Saturday, 21 April 2012 20:34:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 21 April 2012 20:34:59 GMT