- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:06:12 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
It would be helpful to allow a prefix to be defined in terms of a
previously defined prefix, so that one could write a query like this:
PREFIX testingGraph: <http://example/non-intuitive-URI/g147x2>
PREFIX productionGraph: <http://example/non-intuitive-URI/g42m11>
PREFIX graphToUse: testingGraph:
INSERT ... GRAPH graphToUse: { ... }
WHERE ... GRAPH graphToUse: { ... }
This way, to change the query from test to production use, one only
needs to change one prefix definition, and it is still very mnemonic:
PREFIX graphToUse: productionGraph:
Without this ability, one would instead have to write something like the
following, which is far less mnemonic (because URIs are often not very
intuitive):
PREFIX graphToUse: <http://example/non-intuitive-URI/g42m11>
This ability would also enable groups of related graph names to be
managed a little easier. For example, a query might use three input
graphs and produce one output graph:
PREFIX testBase: <http://example/test-URI-base/>
PREFIX productionBase: <http://example/production-URI-base/>
PREFIX graphBase: testBase:
INSERT ... GRAPH graphBase:output { ... }
WHERE ... GRAPH graphBase:input1 { ... }
... GRAPH graphBase:input2 { ... }
... GRAPH graphBase:input3 { ... }
However, at present the grammar for PREFIX definitions does not permit a
prefix to be defined in terms of a previously defined prefix:
http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#rPrefixDecl
[6] PrefixDecl ::= 'PREFIX' PNAME_NS IRI_REF
I suggest changing grammar rule 6 to:
[6] PrefixDecl ::= 'PREFIX' PNAME_NS IRIref
This would allow the prefix to be defined in terms of either an IRI_REF
or a PrefixedName, per rule 125:
[125] IRIref ::= IRI_REF | PrefixedName
If the working group decides not to include this ability in SPARQL 1.1
(especially given how late this comment is arriving) then please put it
on a wish list for a future version.
Thanks!
--
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/
Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
Received on Monday, 12 September 2011 18:06:46 UTC