W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol Working Draft 14 October 2010

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:10:23 +0000
Cc: "Chimezie Ogbuji" <chimezie@gmail.com>, "Ian Davis" <ian.davis@talis.com>, <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3CE39348-7B83-475F-8C41-B013F5487265@deri.org>
To: Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com>
Dear Gregg,

just for clarification:

 The latest working draft is this one:
   http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20101014/
 (that link was also corrected on our wiki page)

 The link 
   http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/
 always refers to the latest working draft version of the document, i.e. at the moment to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20101014/

The link
 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/
is the current *Editor's draft* which is a document in flux that will eventually evolve into the next upcoming Working draft version.

I was not entirely sure whether your mail was meant as a comment or whether you implied any action for the group, 
but I hope that clarifies matters, could you briefly acknowledge?

Thanks a lot,
Axel

On 25 Jan 2011, at 22:01, Gregg Reynolds wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Ian. Thanks for your comments, see the response(s) below (in
> ...
> 
> FYI the version links on the drafts refer to "http-rdf-update".  The "Latest Version" link on http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20100126/ points to the October draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/).  We also have http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ which has no Version links.
> 
> -Gregg 
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 09:10:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 January 2011 09:10:58 GMT