W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Editorial clarification in Basic Graph Pattern intro

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:17:42 +0000
Message-ID: <4EDCB666.3050800@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
David,

Thank you for your suggestions - I have incorporated them into the the 
editors working draft.

	Andy

On 18/10/11 20:26, David Booth wrote:
> Sec 5.1 says:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#BasicGraphPatterns
> [[
> A sequence of triple patterns interrupted by a filter comprises a single
> basic graph pattern.
> ]]
> The word "interrupted" is ambiguous, as it sometimes means
> "terminated" (no continuation) and other times it means "paused" (with
> continuation).  I suggest rewording the sentence as:
> [[
> A sequence of triple patterns, with optional filters, comprises a single
> basic graph pattern.
> ]]
>
> That section also says:
> [[
> Any graph pattern terminates a basic graph pattern.
> ]]
> *Any* graph pattern?  That doesn't seem to make sense, because a
> sequence of triple patterns is a graph pattern.  Perhaps that sentence
> was supposed to say "Any *other* graph pattern terminates a basic graph
> pattern"?
>
>
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 12:18:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 December 2011 12:18:12 GMT