Thanks for the answer. I understood the answer but the proliferation of ontologies for using SPARQL does not simplify the developpement. It's my opinion. Regards Karima Rafes http://en.sparql.pro 2011/8/2 Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com> > On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:44 AM, Karima Rafes wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I try to build in javascript a program to generate a graph of LOD. > > > > In http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/ > > I cannot find the property to say if the source is "media", > user-generated, government, etc... > > like in this example of graph > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lod-datasets_2010-09-22_colored.png > > > > Is this an oversight? > > This is not an oversight. The service description vocabulary is intended to > describe the features of a SPARQL Query and Protocol implementation. The > service description vocabulary provides a framework to describe an > endpoint's service. The description of the data served by an endpoint is > left to be served by other vocabularies (e.g. VoiD). > > We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comments have been > answered by sending a reply to this mailing list. > > Regards, Gregory Williams, on behalf of the SPARQL WG. > >Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 15:25:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 August 2011 15:25:48 GMT