W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2010

Re: SPARQL 1.1 Protocol: Format of fault messages

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:52:09 +0100
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <FD4CB76A-526B-42BC-8F44-616C1C390363@cyganiak.de>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>

On 3 Oct 2010, at 22:05, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>> If you write in the spec that they should serve XHTML, then they
>> will serve you tag soup. This is not a realistic option.
> what if i say it's XML which happens to parse as HTML?

And you think they won't realize that you ask them to serve XHTML?

To be honest, given that you seem to be happy with XML as the default  
successful result format, I don't understand why you go to such  
efforts for a human-readable and extensible *error* format. You have  
that a bit backwards.

Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 11:54:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:11 UTC