W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > March 2009

Re: SPARQL working group - call for suggested features

From: Chabot Bernard <chabot.bernard@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:36:21 +0100
Message-ID: <f67429a20903110236h4b43d994m54e248edd049bc21@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Hello,
I would like to suggest a feature allowing a recursive research in a RDF
graph.

For example if my graph describe a hierarchic BOM (Bill of Material) linking
"Part" instances together through a "has_part" predicat
and each "Part" linked with "Document" instances through a "documented_by"
predicat

How to retrieve :
   - All the "Document" linked to one given "Part" and all the "Document
linked to the sub-parts of this given "Part" ?

Motivation :
It is a very frequent question in the PLM area (Product Lifecycle
Management) !

Regards,

Bernard


On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:11 PM, CHB <chabot.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> Sent to you by CHB via Google Reader:
>
>
> SPARQL working group - call for suggested features<http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2009/03/04/sparql_working_group_call_for_suggested_>
> via W3C Semantic Web Activity News <http://www.w3.org/blog/SW> by Lee
> Feigenbaum on 03/03/09
>
> The SPARQL Working Group <http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/> has started
> up and is beginning its work by gathering potential features to extend the
> SPARQL language, protocol, results format, and/or general SPARQL landscape.
>
> We invite all members of the community to suggest features/extensions to
> SPARQL that you find most important. To contribute, please do the following:
>
>    1. Check the list of existing feature suggestions<http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Category:Features>to make sure your suggestion has not already been recorded.
>    2. Send email to public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org<http://www-mit.w3.orgmailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>with your suggestion, including this information:
>       - A description of the feature
>       - An example of the feature in action (e.g. sample syntax, sample
>       HTTP requests, sample XML documents, ...)
>       - Information on existing implementations of the feature
>       - Motivating use cases for the feature (i.e. why do you find it
>       important?)
>
> Please note that due to time and resource constraints, the SPARQL Working
> Group expects to accept for further work only a small fraction of the total
> number of features considered. The Working Group does not expect to respond
> directly to all submitted feature suggestions.
>
> The Working Group is pursuing an aggressive schedule. Please submit
> suggestions by Tuesday, March 10, 2009.
>
>
>
> Things you can do from here:
>
>    - Subscribe to W3C Semantic Web Activity News<http://www.google.com/reader/view/feed%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fblog%2FSW%3Ftempskin%3D_atom?source=email>using
>    *Google Reader*
>    - Get started using Google Reader<http://www.google.com/reader/?source=email>to easily keep up with
>    *all your favourite sites*
>
>
>
>



-- 
Bernard Chabot
PLM Consultant
PCO Innovation
06.85.19.42.51
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 12:27:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 12 March 2009 12:27:57 GMT