re-posting with earl as application/turtle attachment * Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2007-10-02 23:23-0700] > Dave Beckett wrote earlier today: > > EARL results for a snapshot of Rasqal in Subversion are > > attached in Turtle. > > I removed the RDF/XML since the resulting email didn't make > it to the list - too large? > > It turns out my test runner was broken (I blame XML::Simple) > and the actual results are slightly better than the first run: > Fail: 100 > Pass: 326 (77% pass) > > The rest of my response are as before > > > You asked for feedback on the tests: > > #dawg-optional-filter-004: fail > > #dawg-optional-filter-005-simplified: fail > > #dawg-optional-filter-005-not-simplified: pass > > > > However Rasqal's particularly bad at optionals and filters, so > > I have no confidence it's doing the right thing. > > > > When you asked: > > [[ > > b) Whether or not you pass #dawg-optional-filter-004, do you have a > > preference for which behavior the SPARQL spec. dictates for this particular > > issue? > > ]] > > reading > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0178.html > > I would not have expected the FILTER to be moved up to the top left join > > but I have no strong preference as long as the spec clarifies this. > > Dave -- -eric office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA mobile: +1.617.599.3509 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:52 GMT