W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Re: EARL test suite report for Rasqal 0.9.15-pre SVN r12759 (updated)

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:50:55 -0400
To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20071003135055.GE5657@w3.org>
re-posting with earl as application/turtle attachment

* Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2007-10-02 23:23-0700]
> Dave Beckett wrote earlier today:
> > EARL results for a snapshot of Rasqal in Subversion are
> > attached in Turtle.
> 
> I removed the RDF/XML since the resulting email didn't make
> it to the list - too large?
> 
> It turns out my test runner was broken (I blame XML::Simple)
> and the actual results are slightly better than the first run:
>   Fail: 100
>   Pass: 326 (77% pass)
> 
> The rest of my response are as before
> 
> > You asked for feedback on the tests:
> > #dawg-optional-filter-004: fail
> > #dawg-optional-filter-005-simplified: fail
> > #dawg-optional-filter-005-not-simplified: pass
> > 
> > However Rasqal's particularly bad at optionals and filters, so
> > I have no confidence it's doing the right thing.
> > 
> > When you asked:
> > [[
> > b) Whether or not you pass #dawg-optional-filter-004, do you have a
> > preference for which behavior the SPARQL spec. dictates for this particular
> > issue?
> > ]]
> > reading
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0178.html
> > I would not have expected the FILTER to be moved up to the top left join
> > but I have no strong preference as long as the spec clarifies this.
> 
> Dave
-- 
-eric

office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
mobile: +1.617.599.3509

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.



Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:51:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:52 GMT