Re: comments on SPARQL Query Language for RDF

• From: Andrew Newman <andrewfnewman@gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 08:40:26 +1000
• To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
• Message-ID: <2db5a5c40705221540t3a79d9a4pea2e482dc185cc1b@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/23/07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
> 9/ A Fundamental Disagreement on SPARQL
>
> I still object to the fact that SPARQL can produce different results for
> equivalent RDF graphs, as described in Section 12.3.2.
>

I was wondering if Peter is the only one to disagree with SPARQL or
whether the SPARQL group has actually made sure it's
resolved/managed/answered the questions related to the SPARQL
specification.

I still wonder, and haven't found, why the working group decided to
choose a different data model in SPARQL from RDF's.

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 22:40:30 UTC