W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > May 2007


From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:07:30 -0700
Message-Id: <451E7F2E-0074-4911-9E24-EF0562BBAB70@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
To: "Geoff Chappell" <gchappell@intellidimension.com>

> I realized that DESCRIBE is somewhat loosely defined, but wondering  
> what
> other implementations have done in this situation. Any guidance
> appreciated....

As an implementer: I would expect the DESCRIBE to run against the  
dataset specified by the FROM/FROM NAMED, not just the contributing  
graphs, and certainly not the whole store. As to what the  
implementation should do with the named/default dichotomy... well,  
that'll be implementation-defined.
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 02:08:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:08 UTC