Re: Unexpected DISTINCT?

On 3/28/07, Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Richard Newman wrote on 02/25/2007 02:27:53 AM:
>
> In the absence of the DISTINCT or REDUCED keywords, the specification
> gives a precise cardinality for the solutions that appear in the solution
> sequence.
>

Does this mean the DISTINCT part of the SPARQL specification is
incorrect? It says:
"The solution sequence with no DISTINCT or REDUCED modifier may
include duplicate solutions"

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#modDistinct

Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2007 20:56:34 UTC