W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Unexpected DISTINCT?

From: Andrew Newman <andrewfnewman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:56:28 +1000
Message-ID: <2db5a5c40703271356l3d24d609x8c00b6bd9f9c941a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Lee Feigenbaum" <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, rnewman@franz.com

On 3/28/07, Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Richard Newman wrote on 02/25/2007 02:27:53 AM:
>
> In the absence of the DISTINCT or REDUCED keywords, the specification
> gives a precise cardinality for the solutions that appear in the solution
> sequence.
>

Does this mean the DISTINCT part of the SPARQL specification is
incorrect? It says:
"The solution sequence with no DISTINCT or REDUCED modifier may
include duplicate solutions"

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#modDistinct
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2007 20:56:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:51 GMT