W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > February 2007

SPARQL solution to unsaid issue satisfies PRIME requirements

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:53:41 -0600
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Thomas.Kriegelstein@tu-dresden.de
Message-Id: <1172696021.26341.61.camel@dirk>

The PRIME project has a requirement related
to the "unsaid" issue and objective 4.3 Non-existent Triples
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/#d4.3

The current OPTIONAL/!bound() technique in SPARQL
reportedly meets their requirements.

<Kriegel> danc: don't miss : http://rafb.net/p/a06a4u49.html
<Kriegel> especially the end..
* DanC takes a look, opening window #93792
<antipasto> hehehe
<DanC> ah. prime... and OPTIONAL/!bound(), i.e. unsaid. so you guys are
happy enough with the way SPARQL addresses the unsaid issue?
--> HarryH (n=hhalpin@user-152-3-214-225.wireless.duke.edu) has joined
#swig
<-- iand has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
--> Kriegel_ (n=kriegel@p54B3165F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #swig
<DanC> gesunheit
<DanC> replaying...
<DanC> ah. prime... and OPTIONAL/!bound(), i.e. unsaid. so you guys are
happy enough with the way SPARQL addresses the unsaid issue?
<Kriegel_> danc: we're quite happy
<Kriegel_> danc: we have some HCI issues over here, we only have to
return the label for the most specific class to be used in the UI
<DanC> please take a moment to say so in email to
public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
<DanC> or I can mail this chat there, if you prefer
<Kriegel_> yes please do
<Kriegel_> .oO( don't they monitor the log of this chat ? :)
<DanC> I'd like to copy you... what email address is best?
<DanC> logger, pointer?
<logger> See http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2007-02-28#T20-50-23
<Kriegel_> Thomas.Kriegelstein@tu-dresden.de is the address

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 21:02:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:51 GMT