W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > February 2007

Ambiguity for Literal order in SPARQL

From: Stephane Fellah <stephanef@imagemattersllc.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:50:23 -0500
To: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001401c755bf$3c252410$4500a8c0@SmartWorld>
Hi,

 

The SPARQL specification is quite ambiguous on the sorting for literals.
The specification mentioned in section 10.1.1. ORDER BY,  the following
order criteria.

 

1.	(Lowest) no value assigned to the variable or expression in this
solution.
2.	Blank nodes
3.	IRIs
4.	RDF literals
5.	A plain literal is lower than an RDF literal with type xsd:string of
the same lexical form.

I like to get more clarification about the order of plain literal with
language as well as typed literal. I know that ARQ is handling this case,
but I like to see this formalized in the specs to ensure that ordering
remains consistent between implementations.  Thanks in advance

 

Best regards

 

Stephane Fellah

KnowledgeSmarts Architect 

Image Matters LLC

 

HYPERLINK "http://www.imagemattersllc.com/"http://www.imagemattersllc.com

 


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.412 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/693 - Release Date: 2/19/2007
 
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 13:50:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:51 GMT