Thank you Andy. The changes are perfect. Ivan Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > Ivan Herman wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> In 12.3.1: I was wondering whether, mathematically, it is not more >> precise to say in the definition of the cardinality of mu that P(BGP) is >> a subgraph of G. P = mu(sigma) is a mapping and not a (sub)graph > > yes, I agree - I've changed the text to: > > """ > card[Omega](mu) = card[Omega](number of distinct RDF instance mappings, > sigma, such that P = mu(sigma) is a pattern instance mapping and P(BGP) > is a subgraph of G) > """ > >> >> In 12.5: Evaluation of a graph pattern: >> Patten -> Pattern (in the title) >> In the first line, shouldn't it be eval(D(D[IRI]),P)? >> shouldn't it be OMEGA(?var->i) instead of OMEGA(?v->i)? > > Corrected. > >> >> Ivan > > These changes have been made to the editors' working draft: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25.html v1.81 > > I hope this message addresses your comments to your satisfaction. If it > does, please let us know by replying to this message to say so. If you > change the line to include [CLOSED] it will help the scripts used for > tracking comments. > > Andy > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:51 GMT