- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:20:46 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In 12.3.1: I was wondering whether, mathematically, it is not more precise to say in the definition of the cardinality of mu that P(BGP) is a subgraph of G. P = mu(sigma) is a mapping and not a (sub)graph In 12.5: Evaluation of a graph pattern: Patten -> Pattern (in the title) In the first line, shouldn't it be eval(D(D[IRI]),P)? shouldn't it be OMEGA(?var->i) instead of OMEGA(?v->i)? Ivan - -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGEkaedR3hQzQ/Gj0RAlByAJ408WV1vEinf9zUPl/hz/cOsrNgyQCgpbK9 IMkm0YOwDvW8TK3uYJcUIo4= =vurz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 06:11:42 UTC