W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > April 2007

minor editorial comments

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:20:46 +0200
Message-ID: <4612469E.8040600@w3.org>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In 12.3.1: I was wondering whether, mathematically, it is not more
precise to say in the definition of the cardinality of mu that P(BGP) is
a subgraph of G. P = mu(sigma) is a mapping and not a (sub)graph

In 12.5: Evaluation of a graph pattern:
	Patten -> Pattern (in the title)
	In the first line, shouldn't it be eval(D(D[IRI]),P)?
	shouldn't it be OMEGA(?var->i) instead of OMEGA(?v->i)?

Ivan

- --

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGEkaedR3hQzQ/Gj0RAlByAJ408WV1vEinf9zUPl/hz/cOsrNgyQCgpbK9
IMkm0YOwDvW8TK3uYJcUIo4=
=vurz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 06:11:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:51 GMT