W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2006

Comments on dawg test cases

From: Faisal Alkhateeb <Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:12:37 +0200
Message-ID: <1160986357.45333ef51d79c@listes-serv.inrialpes.fr>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Hello,

   The result of the following query is not clear
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-005
and i think the result is empty.

Regarding the sorting of the following query, is not it in the reverse order 
(that is descending as it is clear, since E > F > B > A).
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sort-1
And so on for the rest of sorting queries.

The sorting result of the following query is mixed (i.e., neither ascending 
nor descending)
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sort-7 


I want to know if it is syntactically possible to use the keyword FILTER as a 
namespace prefix as done in the following query:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#keyword-filter-as-a-namespace-
prefix


In the following queries, we use '(' after WHERE clause instead of '{'.

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-001
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-002


And finally, for the following query, the result is not empty:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#extendedtype-ne-fail
-- 
Faisal Alkhateeb
INRIA Rhone-Alpes
ZIRST - 655 avenue de l'Europe - Montbonnot
38334 Saint Ismier Cedex - France
Tel: +33 4 76 61 52 66
Fax: +33 4 76 61 52 07
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 08:12:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT