W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2006

SPARQL - UNION - disjunction issue

From: MacLeod Nichols <macleod@stauber-nichols.ca>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:09:02 -0400
Message-ID: <451DFBEE.7030604@stauber-nichols.ca>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

The results of UNION as described could still be accomplished through 
other uses of the SPARQL language. Therefore omitting the UNION keyword 
would not greatly change the task of implementing SPARQL.
At the same time, users would come to understand that the use of UNION 
is expensive just as they do when using the same keyword in SQL.
So to avoid implementing such as a useful keyword seems unnecessary.

M. Nichols
Toronto, Canada
Received on Sunday, 1 October 2006 03:08:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:07 UTC