W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > March 2006

Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)

From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 00:43:21 +0100
Message-Id: <693379E3-9D88-4B93-920C-410EA81045E1@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: eric@w3.org, connolly@w3.org, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
On 7 Mar 2006, at 00:26, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> (This also depends on just how the scoping graph is determined.)
>>
>> Mmhh, I'd say that it does not depend on that: the answer is uniquely
>> determined up to bnode renaming. Why are you saying that?
>
> Well, changing the scoping graph can change the permissable  
> answers, or at
> least that is what I believe based on the SPARL documents.

The scoping graph is always isomorphic to the original dataset - the  
only things that may change are the names of the bnodes. This has no  
effect on the answer set, apart from having possibly different bnode  
names.

--e.

Received on Monday, 6 March 2006 23:43:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT