W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > March 2006

Re: [OK?] Re: Comments on SPARQL protocol document

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:54:54 +0000
Message-ID: <440C4D3E.8070104@ninebynine.org>
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Kendall,

I've been sitting on your messages for some while, and still haven't found time
to refresh my position.  Based on your direct responses I'll say that, unless I
do actually come back with any further comments, that you have indeed been
responsive to my comments concerning:
  over-prescriptivity
  generation of warnings
  spoofed server responses

#g
--

Kendall Clark wrote:
> 
> On Jan 17, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Kendall Clark wrote:
> 
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2005, at 9:31 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>> I would probably focus any such suggestions on security mechanisms,
>>> and leave the policy specification/decision mechanisms to be
>>> application-dependent.
>>
>> The latest editor's draft of the protocol spec removes all privacy
>> policy discussion. Is that responsive to yr comments about
>> over-prescriptivity?
> 
> Oops, sorry, Graham, I should have included a link:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
> 
> Cheers,
> Kendall
> 
> 

-- 
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 6 March 2006 14:58:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT