W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2006

Fw: [closed]Re:Re: Error definition

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:35:11 -0400
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF11343331.56C30BC4-ON8525718F.00500FD7-8525718F.00501FB1@us.ibm.com>

(forwarding [closed] message for bookkeeping purposes.)

Lee

----- Forwarded by Lee Feigenbaum/Cambridge/IBM on 06/16/2006 10:34 AM 
-----

Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr wrote on 06/16/2006 04:07:22 AM:

> Quoting Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > ---
> > Please respond indicating whether you are or are not satisfied with
> > this response. If you are, you can help our issue tracking system by
> > prefixing the subject of your response with [CLOSED] (where this
> > subject has [OK?]).
> > ---
> > 
> > > > > - Is the case that blanks are not allowed in the predicate 
position?
> > > > 
> > > > SPARQL does allow blank nodes in the predicate position of triple 
> > > > patterns. As per 
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#BasicGraphPattern:
> > > > 
> > > > """
> > > > This definition also allows blank nodes in the predicate position.
> > > > """
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I think the definition does not allow blank nodes in the predicate 
> > position.
> > > 
> > 
> > Whoops, I should read my responses more carefully =) You are, of 
course, 
> > correct, and the offending line of text that conflicts with the 
definition 
> > has been removed from the editor's draft in section 2.3 of:
> > 
> >   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#BasicGraphPattern
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Lee
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 14:35:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT