- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:45:39 -0400
- To: Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@w3.org
Hello, --- Please respond indicating whether you are or are not satisfied with this response. If you are, you can help our issue tracking system by prefixing the subject of your response with [CLOSED] (where this subject has [OK?]). --- > > > - Is the case that blanks are not allowed in the predicate position? > > > > SPARQL does allow blank nodes in the predicate position of triple > > patterns. As per http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#BasicGraphPattern: > > > > """ > > This definition also allows blank nodes in the predicate position. > > """ > > > > I think the definition does not allow blank nodes in the predicate position. > Whoops, I should read my responses more carefully =) You are, of course, correct, and the offending line of text that conflicts with the definition has been removed from the editor's draft in section 2.3 of: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#BasicGraphPattern thanks, Lee
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2006 13:45:49 UTC